Free side-by-side research
Source-linked differences for fleet and maintenance managers. No sponsored winner and no blended review score.
AUTOsist is a fleet maintenance and asset-tracking platform aimed at SMBs, centered on preventive maintenance, digital inspections, work orders, and parts inventory. Higher tiers layer on native GPS telematics and in-cab safety cameras.
UpKeep is a mobile-first CMMS with a dedicated Fleet product that layers vehicle-specific capabilities onto its core maintenance engine. It handles usage-based preventive maintenance (miles, engine hours, or calendar days), mobile work orders, digital DVIRs with photos and flagged defects, parts management, and VIN-based vehicle history. It is genuinely maintenance-first: compliance records are DOT/OSHA audit-ready, and PMs auto-generate work orders when thresholds are hit. Real-time GPS, speed, and engine diagnostics come from integrating existing telematics (Samsara, Geotab, Motive) rather than UpKeep hardware, so it is not a native-GPS platform. Pricing starts at $24/user/mo (Essential) and $55/user/mo (Premium), with Professional and Enterprise tiers on custom quotes.
How AUTOsist and UpKeep line up, side by side. Rows where they differ are highlighted.
| Feature | AUTOsist |
UpKeep |
|---|---|---|
| Capterra rating | 4.7/5 (163) | 4.6/5 (1,329) |
| Starting price | From $6/vehicle/mo (billed annually) | From $24/user/mo (Essential) |
| Best for | Small and midsize fleets and equipment-heavy operations that want simple, affordable maintenance tracking without a steep learning curve. | Maintenance-led fleets (mixed vehicle + facility/equipment operations) that want a mobile-first CMMS built around work orders, PMs, and DVIRs rather than GPS tracking. |
| Preventive maintenance | ✓ | ✓ |
| Work orders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Inspections & DVIR | ✓ | ✓ |
| Parts inventory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fuel tracking | ✓ | — |
| Native GPS tracking | ✓ | — |
| Asset management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Compliance | ✓ | ✓ |
This is a fit comparison, not a universal winner. A tool built for an enterprise fleet with native telematics is not the same as one built for a small in-house shop. Validate the decisive maintenance workflow and total contract cost in both demos.
Start here when: Small and midsize fleets and equipment-heavy operations that want simple, affordable maintenance tracking without a steep learning curve..
Start here when: Maintenance-led fleets (mixed vehicle + facility/equipment operations) that want a mobile-first CMMS built around work orders, PMs, and DVIRs rather than GPS tracking..
Ratings are kept separate because software directories, app stores and company-location reviews measure different experiences.
Swipe horizontally to compare both products →
| Review platform | AUTOsist | UpKeep |
|---|---|---|
| Capterra | 4.7/5163 reviewsChecked July 17, 2026 · open source ↗ | 4.6/51,329 reviewsChecked July 17, 2026 · open source ↗ |
We do not calculate a single “reputation score.” Compare rating, volume, audience and recent themes at the original source.
These items come from vendor documentation. Treat them as a demo agenda, not proof of workflow quality.
Research interpretation based on current positioning and official documentation—not a substitute for implementation references.
A strong fit for cost-conscious SMB fleets that want core maintenance management first and can add telematics later as a paid tier.
A real fleet maintenance CMMS, not pure telematics. UpKeep Fleet covers the maintenance core well (PM, work orders, DVIR inspections, parts, vehicle asset history, DOT compliance), which is why the maintenance facets are true. It has no native GPS hardware and no dedicated fuel cost/consumption tracking module (it only surfaces a live "Fuel Level" reading pulled from third-party telematics), so native_gps and fuel_tracking are false. Best fit for shops that already run maintenance in a CMMS and want vehicles in the same system, or that plug in an existing telematics provider for location data.
Open the evidence directly. Dates describe our last check, not a promise that the vendor page has remained unchanged.
A fair comparison uses identical data and workflow scenarios.